Well, this is a subject that really has no impact on our current lives,
but yet some folks still like to know these things. When it comes to the
life sequence of the stars, it really depends on the size of the
glowing celestial body we are talking about. Unlike what some people may
think, the larger stars actually have a more turbulent & shorter
life when compared to a smaller, slower burning star like the one in our
Solar System - in which we call the Sun.
Instead of giving some long, drawn-out science lesson, I'll cut to the
chase and get right down to the pertinent matters at hand. The
illustration I used for this post sums it up in a nutshell, although one
must forgive the crudeness of my model because it comes via the MS
Paint program; ha! Low-mass to intermediate-mass stars have a much
longer life on the main sequence. They burn for a very long time (much
longer than high-mass stars) before they turn into a red giant. From
that particular end-stage (red giant) of their life, they simply end up
turning into a situation involving what we'd call a planetary nebula
and, without all the excess science, a white dwarf.
The high-mass stars turn into a red giant much quicker, then, due to
their enormous mass, go into a stage called the red supergiant. This is
where a supernova forms. The ones with this size, after becoming a
supernova, ultimately turn into a neutron star. The stars that are even
bigger than those, in which have a relatively gigantic amount of mass,
go from a supernova into a black hole. Some people still claim that
black holes don't exist, but let's not get ridiculous here.
After clicking the image to enlarge, you will see that I skipped all of
the steps during the main sequence. If I fully included the incremental age progressions of the stars in that diagram, it would show the same
star basically being at the same size for a lengthy amount of time.
Instead of wasting time trying to illustrate the differences between the
main sequence from small stars to large, I figured that you would
understand the fact that the bigger and hotter stars burn out much
quicker than the smaller, cooler stars. It is the outcome/end result of
the star in question, that is the most interesting, in my opinion.
I realize that after writing this little string of verbiage, that I
probably should have elaborated about what a supernova is along with a
neutron star, not to mention a black hole. I'm assuming that many
of you couldn't care less about any of this, but I still may do a post
about the other stuff, to fill in the blanks, later on. In fact, some people would rather read silly posts like "Why would anybody climb an active volcano?" as opposed to this cosmic chatter; ha! Anyway, for the ones
that already know about the various types of life sequences that are
involved with stars of different sizes, you are merely stuck with my
illustration to laugh at. Either way, thanks for reading...
Image Credit: My own photo.
---End of Post "Life Sequence of the Stars"
No comments:
Post a Comment